1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 358 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XK |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1758 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |