1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar X-Type (228 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 20 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | X-Type |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2590 mm |