1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 840 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 6C | Minica |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2350 mm |
