1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 306 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 6C | CTS |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5965 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2890 mm |
