1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ranger |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 84 L |