1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 413 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | CLS |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 507 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |