1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 20 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | 6C | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2380 mm |
