1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 550 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | Rustler |
Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 54 L |