1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 6C | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2685 mm |
