1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | E-350 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 57 L |