1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Ka has automatic transmission and 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Ka |
Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |