1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A5 (208 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A5 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2013 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | A5 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | rear |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4626 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2751 mm |
