1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 368 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | XC60 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2774 mm |