1949 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Volvo XC90

To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 610 kg more than 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1949 Alfa Romeo 6C 2013 Volvo XC90
Make Alfa Romeo Volvo
Model 6C XC90
Year Released 1949 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 3200 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 6 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 237 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 2160 kg
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 4807 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1936 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1784 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2857 mm