1949 Allard J vs. 1964 Austin Princess
To start off, 1964 Austin Princess is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1964 Austin Princess. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Austin Princess weights approximately 1316 kg more than 1949 Allard J.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 1964 Austin Princess | |
| Make | Allard | Austin |
| Model | J | Princess |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 72 L |
