1949 Allard J vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 24 kg more than 1949 Allard J.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Allard | Riley |
| Model | J | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 25 L |
