1949 Allard J vs. 1973 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1973 Chrysler Charger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler Charger (227 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 516 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 1973 Chrysler Charger | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | J | Charger |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 5211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1380 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
