1949 Allard J vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1949 Allard J has manual transmission. 1949 Allard J will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Allard | Oldsmobile |
| Model | J | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 3344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2670 mm |
