1949 Allard J vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 1995 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 366 kg more than 1949 Allard J.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Allard J. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | J | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
