1949 Allard J vs. 2000 Daewoo Matiz
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Allard J weights approximately 24 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2000 Daewoo Matiz | |
| Make | Allard | Daewoo |
| Model | J | Matiz |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |
