1949 Allard J vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 120 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 323 kg more than 1949 Allard J.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2003 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | J | Cavalier |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 56 L |