1949 Allard J vs. 2004 Audi A6
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (265 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 931 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2004 Audi A6 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | J | A6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1795 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 70 L |