1949 Allard J vs. 2004 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Swift is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Swift. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 181 kg more than 1949 Allard J.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Swift, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2004 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Allard | Suzuki |
| Model | J | Swift |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1045 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 40 L |
