1949 Allard J vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 701 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | J | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 61 L |
