1949 Allard J vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 970 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Allard J. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Allard | Jeep |
Model | J | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1834 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 70 L |