1949 Allard J vs. 2005 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 723 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2005 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Allard | Lotec |
| Model | J | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1150 mm |
