1949 Allard J vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Allard J is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard J. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | J | 6 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1544 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 68 L |