1949 Allard J vs. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (224 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 972 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Allard | Mercury |
Model | J | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1949 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 224 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 72 L |