1949 Allard J vs. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 756 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Allard | Chrysler |
| Model | J | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 60 L |
