1949 Allard J vs. 2008 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2008 MG ZT-T is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT-T (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT-T weights approximately 951 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J | 2008 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Allard | MG |
| Model | J | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 65 L |
