1949 Allard J vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1949 Allard J. (120 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 261 kg more than 1949 Allard J. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | J | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 870 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 113 L | 64 L |