1949 Allard J1 vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J1 (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J1 should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 150 kg more than 1949 Allard J1.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Allard J1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Allard J1 (306 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1949 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J1 | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | J1 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
