1949 Allard J1 vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW M3 (444 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1949 Allard J1. (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Allard J1 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW M3 (480 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Allard J1. (306 Nm). This means 2002 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Allard J1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J1 | 2002 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Allard | BMW |
| Model | J1 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3917 cc | 3997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 306 Nm | 480 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2890 mm |
