1949 Allard J2 vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J2 (158 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Allard J2 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J2 | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 179 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 57 L |
