1949 Allard J2 vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J2 (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 406 kg more than 1949 Allard J2.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Allard J2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J2 | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | 626 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 74 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 58 L |
