1949 Allard J2 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Allard J2 (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (157 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1949 Allard J2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 80 kg more than 1949 Allard J2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J2 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | J2 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1949 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5416 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 48 L |