1949 Allard J2 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1949 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 970 kg more than 1949 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J2 | 2004 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | J2 | Astro |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5416 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 102.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 117 L |