1949 Allard J2 vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1949 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 205 kg more than 1949 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Allard J2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard J2 | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | J2 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1949 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5416 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 87 L |