1949 Allard J2 vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1949 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1949 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard J2 | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1341 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2703 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 64 L |
