1949 Allard K1 vs. 1952 Ferrari 340 MM
To start off, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard K1 would be higher. At 4,102 cc (12 cylinders), 1952 Ferrari 340 MM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM (300 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1949 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ferrari 340 MM should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard K1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ferrari 340 MM weights approximately 22 kg more than 1949 Allard K1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard K1 | 1952 Ferrari 340 MM | |
| Make | Allard | Ferrari |
| Model | K1 | 340 MM |
| Year Released | 1949 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4102 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77.9 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 68 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1067 kg | 1089 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
