1949 Allard K1 vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2004 Rover City is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard K1 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard K1 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1949 Allard K1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Allard K1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Allard K1 | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Allard | Rover |
Model | K1 | City |
Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |