1949 Allard M1 vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard M1 would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Allard M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1949 Allard M1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard M1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard M1 | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | M1 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 189 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
