1949 Allard M1 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Allard M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Allard M1 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 183 more horse power than 1949 Allard M1. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1949 Allard M1.
2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1949 Allard M1 has manual transmission. 1949 Allard M1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Allard M1 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | M1 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3621 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
