1949 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Alvis TA 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 343 kg more than 2000 Acura EL.
Because 1949 Alvis TA 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TA 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TA 14 | 2000 Acura EL | |
Make | Alvis | Acura |
Model | TA 14 | EL |
Year Released | 1949 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1704 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2619 mm |