1949 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 1,892 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Alvis TA 14 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 632 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1949 Alvis TA 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TA 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1949 Alvis TA 14 has manual transmission. 1949 Alvis TA 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TA 14 | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Alvis | Mitsubishi |
Model | TA 14 | eK |
Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2350 mm |