1949 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Alvis TA 14 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1949 Alvis TA 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TA 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alvis TA 14 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Alvis | Mazda |
| Model | TA 14 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2650 mm |
