1949 Alvis TA 14 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TA 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TA 14 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TA 14. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TA 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 356 kg more than 1949 Alvis TA 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1949 Alvis TA 14 has manual transmission. 1949 Alvis TA 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1949 Alvis TA 14 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
| Model | TA 14 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1949 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1892 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
