1949 Alvis TB 14 vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TB 14.
Because 1949 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1949 Alvis TB 14 has manual transmission. 1949 Alvis TB 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TB 14 | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Alvis | Mitsubishi |
Model | TB 14 | FTO |
Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 226 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1300 mm |