1949 Alvis TB 14 vs. 1996 Zagato Bravo
To start off, 1996 Zagato Bravo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TB 14 would be higher.
Because 1949 Alvis TB 14 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Alvis TB 14. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Zagato Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Zagato Bravo has automatic transmission and 1949 Alvis TB 14 has manual transmission. 1949 Alvis TB 14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Zagato Bravo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TB 14 | 1996 Zagato Bravo | |
Make | Alvis | Zagato |
Model | TB 14 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1949 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |