1949 Alvis TB 14 vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Alvis TB 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Alvis TB 14 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1949 Alvis TB 14. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1949 Alvis TB 14.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1949 Alvis TB 14 | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TB 14 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1949 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2800 mm |